System performance monitoring nowadays requires regular pyranometer calibration
Solar radiation measurement is a cornerstone of the Performance Ratio (PR) measurement of a PV power plant. It also is the weakest link. This is why according to the latest (2017) version of the IEC 61724-1 you must perform regular pyranometer calibration. This requires sending instruments to a lab. Our worldwide calibration and servicing organisation is at your disposal.
Introduction
In utility scale PV system performance monitoring the solar irradiance is nowadays measured with pyranometers. The PR calculation essentially takes the system’s electrical output and divides it by irradiance. The PR is a key performance indicator of the PV system performance. Accurate day to day and year to year PR records increase the PV system value.
The IEC 61724-1 standard update
The first edition of IEC 61724-1: Photovoltaic system performance monitoring – Guidelines for measurement, data exchange and analysis –, dates from 2008. The updated 2017 version of the standard is fundamentally different from the 2008 version. The new scope not only defines the measuring system components and procedures (as in the 2008 version), but it also aims to keep measurement errors within specified limits.
In the new standard regular recalibration of pyranometers is a requirement.
Why calibration?
Regular calibration is part of quality management for all “mission critical” measuring instruments. Its purpose is verification that the measurement instrument is stable; and if not to correct for this. Pyranometers, due to prolonged exposure to the sun, are not perfectly stable; to attain the high accuracy necessary to monitor PV system performance and degradation you must frequently recalibrate pyranometers.
How often?
Most instrument owners use a calibration interval of 1 year for all their instruments. With pyranometers, the manufacturer’s recommendation is 2 years; it is too costly to calibrate every year. IEC recommends either to work with a 1-year interval or to follow the manufacturer’s recommendation (see Figures 2 and 3). The consensus is that a calibration interval of more than 2 years involves a significant risk. Most utility scale PV power plants employ multiple pyranometers. They may send 50 % away for calibration in year one, and the other 50 % in year two.
Why not on-site?
Pyranometer calibration equipment is costly, bulky and vulnerable; not easy to transport.
Also on-site availability of the natural sun is not sufficiently reliable to use for calibration. Even if the sun shines it may not be sufficiently stable, or at angles that are too close to the horizon.
In practice, high-accuracy solar calibrations are nowadays done at specialised laboratories.
More details why you must send instruments to a laboratory.
Read the full article here:
